BetMGM lawsuit alleges Tennessee self-exclusion violations

A Nashville man has taken BetMGM to courtroom in Tennessee, arguing the sportsbook let him proceed playing for years after he had formally requested to be blocked. The case, now in Davidson County Chancery Courtroom, claims that the corporate did not honor its personal self-exclusion guidelines.

Dilvar Tayip says he signed up for Tennessee’s voluntary self-exclusion record on June 16, 2021. On that very same day, he additionally enrolled in BetMGM’s separate exclusion program. In keeping with his amended petition, each had been supposed to maintain him from betting till June 16, 2026.

Courtroom filings describe Tayip as an skilled sports activities bettor who had beforehand seen monetary success. Nonetheless, he determined in 2021 to step away from playing fully for 5 years. His lawsuit says the state eliminated him from its record sooner than anticipated, in Could 2023, however insists that change mustn’t have affected BetMGM’s impartial restriction.

He factors on to the corporate’s personal coverage, which states, “Self-exclusion is irrevocable and binding for the complete chosen length. As soon as a buyer selects a self-exclusion interval, it can’t be reversed or shortened beneath any circumstances. Elimination from a state record doesn’t alter or override the operator’s separate exclusion obligations.”

What the BetMGM lawsuit in Tennessee claims occurred subsequent

Tayip argues that regardless of that language, BetMGM allowed him to renew wagering shortly after his elimination from the state record. He says he continued inserting bets from Could 2023 by roughly June 2025, with complete wins and losses nearing $300,000 throughout that stretch.

The submitting additionally leans on one other a part of BetMGM’s coverage, which says any wagers positioned by a self-excluded person must be voided and refunded. As an alternative, Tayip claims these bets had been processed usually.

As a part of the criticism, his attorneys included screenshots they are saying present wagers positioned whereas the exclusion remained energetic. One instance reveals a March 23, 2025 parlay with a $1,000 stake and a doable payout of $7,454.55. Further information level to bets from Could 6, 2025, together with wagers of $1,454 and $750.

The lawsuit accuses BetMGM of a variety of violations, together with breaches of the Tennessee Sports Gaming Act and the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. It additionally alleges negligence, fraud, unjust enrichment, and breach of contract. The submitting states BetMGM “knew, or ought to have recognized,” that Tayip was susceptible after formally requesting to be excluded by 2026. It additional claims the corporate inspired him to return to betting and, in earlier filings tied to a federal case file, suggested him on tips on how to depart the state exclusion record early.

Tayip is asking for compensation of the cash he wagered throughout that interval, together with further damages, lawyer charges, and different aid.

Different reviews have pointed to alleged underage marketing emails tied to BetMGM in Massachusetts and a separate class action lawsuit against DraftKings accusing the corporate of exploiting customers with playing addictions.

In the meantime, a March 2026 courtroom order reveals Chancellor I’Ashea L. Myles cut up Tayip’s authentic submitting, directing that administrative appeals and separate claims transfer ahead independently beneath totally different case numbers.

ReadWrite has reached out to BetMGM for remark.

Featured picture: BetMGM / Canva